Civ V
- Jimmy TwoTimes
- Posts: 172
- Joined: 21 Jan 2010, 11:55
- Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:22756162
- Xbox Gamer Tag: PQRKCHQP SAMICH
- Location: Milwaukee, WI
- Riftoff
- •cC• Forum Mod
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: 05 Dec 2008, 11:27
- Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:18836685
- Twitter Username: Riftoff
- Xbox Gamer Tag: Lame Throwa
- Location: SOMEWHERE IN HELL...
Re: Civ V
Yes, very much so. There really isn't much point to Civ 3 and 4 after 5.Jimmy TwoTimes wrote:Is it at all worth it if you already own Civ.4?
-
- Posts: 395
- Joined: 06 Aug 2009, 03:36
- Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:18923152
- Twitter Username: Sergeant_Stevi
- Location: Scotland, United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: Civ V
I have the complete legal version of Civ 4, and I recently got Civ 5, there are many things in Civ 4, such as unit stacking (which you cannot do in Civ 5) that are very handy. Therefore when I decide to bombard a city and try and take it over it's a lot harder, because you can only have so many units nearby, making it harder. So in Civ 4 I would just get like 10 catapults and units that had a high attack strength against cities and stacked them up and if I had enough I managed to get the city in one or two turns. In Civ 5 it's at least 10 turns if you're lucky. I might play multiplayer but I have a slow internet connection, and I generally lag when in multi.
captainangry wrote:Freedom isn't free