calculatedChaos Gaming

Title said it all. Already put my age.

There is a problem with your poll: what if someone who is over 100 years old plays TF2? Then they cant take this poll.
:/

My 6 month old nephew takes offense to this. He is not even 1 year old.

Don't we have intro threads for people to put their age?

10 to 18 is a terrible bracket. should be like 12-17. a 10 year old is not an 18 year old, but a 17 year old is a 12 year old...most of the time.

That's the worst logic ever.

Beetle, I'm sorry, but you lose. Good day sir.

Dep. Redundency Dep. wrote:That's the worst logic ever.

Beetle, I'm sorry, but you lose. Good day sir.

yea cuz it applies to you

Beetle wrote:

Dep. Redundency Dep. wrote:That's the worst logic ever.

Beetle, I'm sorry, but you lose. Good day sir.

yea cuz it applies to you

does this also apply to me seeing as i am turning 17 in about a week and 3 days.

from a statistic point of view, this poll is terrible.

the numbers between each point need to be distributed equally, as if you were going to make a histogram out of it.
any results from this poll will show NOTHING. there is no information you can get out of this.


it should go:
6-11
12-17
18-23
24-29
30-35
36-41
42-47

HuRtMePleNtY wrote:from a statistic point of view, this poll is terrible.

the numbers between each point need to be distributed equally, as if you were going to make a histogram out of it.
any results from this poll will show NOTHING. there is no information you can get out of this.


it should go:
6-11
12-17
18-23
24-29
30-35
36-41
42-47

yea, do you think this is the standard for most polls concerning age just by coincidence?

and, yes plz, it includes you, but not as much as it included dep dep.

HuRtMePleNtY wrote:from a statistic point of view, this poll is terrible.

the numbers between each point need to be distributed equally, as if you were going to make a histogram out of it.
any results from this poll will show NOTHING. there is no information you can get out of this.


it should go:
6-11
12-17
18-23
24-29
30-35
36-41
42-47

Actually I think that the 12-18 window is still a bit too broad. That is the age group that plays tf2 obviously the most, so it should either be broken down into individual ages (that would get you the best info) or you could have 12-14 and 15-17.

thats true, i was just giving an example of a 5 point distribution.

i probably would have done it by 3's.

shouldve done

<15 y/o
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40+

and permabanned anyone who chose the first option

Or how about this. permabanned anyone 15-20 that wasn't here to begin with. yes, that's good. though the funserver would be empty and cpt would be paying for an empty server.

eh I don't mean that. There are a few good apples!

arkawn wrote:shouldve done

<15 y/o
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40+

and permabanned anyone who chose the first option

switch 40+ with 'Old' and I find your post to be perfect.

Or we could just drop age discrimination and get on with our lives.

And Beetle, I would think you could tell the difference between a 12 year old and a 17 year old, or you could very well wind up in jail for that mistake.

"I'm sorry officer, I can't see a difference in maturity and age. I though she was 17."

If only she was 18. Then you could tell.

Ok, I agree that 17 year olds can act like 12, but at least they're old enough to actually buy and play M rated games like tf2. Yes, I'm bringing this up because I turned 17 a little more than a month ago, but I really think they should be included in with the 18 year olds or have their own category. QQ
So yah, it should be:
under 5
5-12
13-16
17-20 (or 17 then 18-20)
and so on. It could be that I complain too much, but... no it's pretty much that.

Link wrote:Ok, I agree that 17 year olds can act like 12, but at least they're old enough to actually buy and play M rated games like tf2. Yes, I'm bringing this up because I turned 17 a little more than a month ago, but I really think they should be included in with the 18 year olds or have their own category. QQ
So yah, it should be:
under 5
5-12
13-16
17-20 (or 17 then 18-20)
and so on. It could be that I complain too much, but... no it's pretty much that.

Who in the right mind would play tf2 at under 5 years old?

Mr. Zora wrote:

Link wrote:Ok, I agree that 17 year olds can act like 12, but at least they're old enough to actually buy and play M rated games like tf2. Yes, I'm bringing this up because I turned 17 a little more than a month ago, but I really think they should be included in with the 18 year olds or have their own category. QQ
So yah, it should be:
under 5
5-12
13-16
17-20 (or 17 then 18-20)
and so on. It could be that I complain too much, but... no it's pretty much that.

Who in the right mind would play tf2 at under 5 years old?

funserver regulars

you guys might be overthinking it

First post in this page should be about Mormons.

I hate Mormons. Mormons are one letter away from morons. Mormons are a religion that like to talk about Jesus and stuff. Mormons still juice from children. Mormons like to eat pretzels in no fly zones.

That's why I should be allowed to take my horse to school.

Vote Ron Paul 2012.

Dep. Redundency Dep. wrote:First post in this page should be about Mormons.

I hate Mormons. Mormons are one letter away from morons. Mormons are a religion that like to talk about Jesus and stuff. Mormons still juice from children. Mormons like to eat pretzels in no fly zones.

That's why I should be allowed to take my horse to school.

Vote Ron Paul 2012.

is it so hard to just wait until the next page in the last post gets $100 thread, it's not like anyone cares there, but dude

topics.

BAMF wrote:is it so hard to just wait until the next page in the last post gets $100 thread, it's not like anyone cares there, but dude topics.

No, I just don't like this thread.