Removing 'high admin'

num yummy · Unread post by **num yummy** » 14 Jul 2010, 11:33

Surnem wrote:I second (third? fourth?) that donators get extra "fun powers." Even if only on the funserver.

Agreed. But they should also get something special on the main server too.

Unread post by **CaliforniaBear** » 14 Jul 2010, 12:46

This wasn't a debate whether they should get something, rather a debate of what they should or should not get ;P

Hence why it's such a fun topic to discuss.

Maybe it'll bring along more donators.

Unread post by **Divine Fate** » 14 Jul 2010, 03:19

Dep. Redundency Dep. wrote:
MrKerplunkers wrote:That my friend is what is called democracy. That being said we give out basic admin powers like freaking candy and that really should've been enough.
That's a horrible metaphor, unless Cc is metaphorically a pedophile and the community is metaphorically under-aged girls.
Also, admin is over rated. Really, really, REALLY over rated.

You've been reading too much of that Lolita book.

Celtic · Unread post by **Celtic** » 14 Jul 2010, 04:05

Not gonna lie, I feel so special that my idea took effect.

Unread post by **Dreathtil-P-V-A** » 14 Jul 2010, 05:56

Divine Fate wrote:
Dep. Redundency Dep. wrote:
MrKerplunkers wrote:That my friend is what is called democracy. That being said we give out basic admin powers like freaking candy and that really should've been enough.
That's a horrible metaphor, unless Cc is metaphorically a pedophile and the community is metaphorically under-aged girls.
Also, admin is over rated. Really, really, REALLY over rated.
You've been reading too much of that Lolita book.

No wonder I got into Cc

Or Is the metaphor just getting to me......

I don't think Donators should really get much because that will lead to something bad and' the from the last clan I was with and from my personal perspective I know what could go wrong But that doesn't mean there are some people who aren't deserving of it if they'er regulars who just don't wanna join

Unread post by **Liquid Death** » 14 Jul 2010, 08:24

Now it's more of an oligarchy. Give a mouse a cookie...

Unread post by **VillageSavant** » 14 Jul 2010, 08:32

I was thinking.. it be just cool to not be able to die after match end. So I can taunt kill the ones who are trying to kill me after beating me. That be epic, then Id log out and is again so they could hear my Eye Of The Tiger.

Unread post by **CaliforniaBear** » 14 Jul 2010, 09:30

VillageSavant wrote:I was thinking.. it be just cool to not be able to die after match end. So I can taunt kill the ones who are trying to kill me after beating me. That be epic, then Id log out and is again so they could hear my Eye Of The Tiger.

I'd let you kill me just so I could hear it.

Unread post by **t00bz** » 14 Jul 2010, 09:59

Dreathtil-P-V-A wrote:
Divine Fate wrote:
Dep. Redundency Dep. wrote:
MrKerplunkers wrote:That my friend is what is called democracy. That being said we give out basic admin powers like freaking candy and that really should've been enough.
That's a horrible metaphor, unless Cc is metaphorically a pedophile and the community is metaphorically under-aged girls.
Also, admin is over rated. Really, really, REALLY over rated.
You've been reading too much of that Lolita book.
No wonder I got into Cc

Or Is the metaphor just getting to me......

I don't think Donators should really get much because that will lead to something bad and' the from the last clan I was with and from my personal perspective I know what could go wrong But that doesn't mean there are some people who aren't deserving of it if they'er regulars who just don't wanna join

not to mention my not so very fond memories of wolfmaster.....

Überectomy · Unread post by **Überectomy** » 15 Jul 2010, 05:58

Of course the people who already have admin would hate the donating part to get admin.I like the concept

Unread post by **Dreathtil-P-V-A** » 15 Jul 2010, 08:29

Überectomy wrote:Of course the people who already have admin would hate the donating part to get admin.I like the concept

Elementary My Dear Watson

uhhhh I mean Überectomy

Unread post by **Beetle** » 15 Jul 2010, 03:15

Dreathtil-P-V-A wrote:
Überectomy wrote:Of course the people who already have admin would hate the donating part to get admin.I like the concept

Elementary My Dear Watson

uhhhh I mean Überectomy

Getting a 5 second audio clip on entrance would be fine. People would be interested enough to ask how to get one themselves and then if nothing else come to the site.

Unread post by **Riftoff** » 16 Jul 2010, 01:58

Admin powers for donators was dumb as balls, (but the time angry nearly scammed nightmare out of some money was commendable) but sounds on entry, special colors on the forums, reserve slots are alright.

Unread post by **Viano** » 16 Jul 2010, 03:22

Okay now hear me out. Instead of special forum colours etc. we get Penis's above our names. Said penis will get larger based on things around the community, how long you've been around, Your admin level, Donations, if you do anything else making maps for the community, making youtube videos etc. All will increase the size of your 'Cc Penis'. When it's not on the site you can even add the size of your 'Cc Penis' to your name in-game to show others your dominance in the cc community.

Unread post by **captainAngry** » 16 Jul 2010, 03:49

The size of my e-penis would be so large that it would crash the server.

Website · Unread post by **Fireproof** » 16 Jul 2010, 04:15

This would be highly embarrassing to the newest members, maybe we could give them sports car icons?

Unread post by **CaliforniaBear** » 16 Jul 2010, 05:51

captainangry wrote:The size of my e-penis would be so large that it would crash the server.

Does this mean I have second biggest? maybe?

LOL at the idea though

Unread post by **Beetle** » 16 Jul 2010, 06:08

No one mentioned how certain ppl like Hanzo or Giggles or Katie 2.0 will react to that?

Unread post by **CaliforniaBear** » 16 Jul 2010, 06:54

I thought the whole "who cares" thought was implied. But I told veronica about it and she just laughed ;O. I'm not sure about hanzo or giggles though

Royalblue · Unread post by **Royalblue** » 18 Jul 2010, 04:01

Boreas wrote:
very reasuuring there bear.

I've got you beat agent I was with Ratz before people formed sm! And as far back as I remember who has admin has always been a topic upon which people wanted a say.

holy crap....... boreas actually posted in the formus

I wish i was there when ratz was around, but my brother was ACTUALLY playing tf2 at that time + CSS cal matches. At least i joined during mid-/-sm-/ (still wish i coulda donated then

)

Felza · Unread post by **Felza** » 18 Jul 2010, 07:58

When will they changes take place or have they already?

Unread post by **Beetle** » 18 Jul 2010, 08:52

Felza wrote:When will they changes take place or have they already?

They can't have taken place because Blue still has noclip.

Unread post by **CaliforniaBear** » 18 Jul 2010, 03:43

From what I've seen, he's a root admin.

I believe captain is now fixing the Immunity system so lower admins can no longer target root admins. Which is quite helpful. -tips hat-

Unread post by **Beetle** » 18 Jul 2010, 06:54

CaliforniaBear wrote:From what I've seen, he's a root admin.

I believe captain is now fixing the Immunity system so lower admins can no longer target root admins. Which is quite helpful. -tips hat-

idk, i feel like ive tried to mute a root admin before and they were immune.

Unread post by **LaN** » 18 Jul 2010, 07:01

CaliforniaBear wrote:From what I've seen, he's a root admin.

I believe captain is now fixing the Immunity system so lower admins can no longer target root admins. Which is quite helpful. -tips hat-

Curses

Unread post by **CaliforniaBear** » 18 Jul 2010, 09:31

"Before" as in today? Or before as in before. With the recent major change with the admin concept, immunity was screwed up a little so lately root admins were being targeted by lower admins, being mass kicked, muted, etc. Such as.

LaN wrote:
CaliforniaBear wrote:From what I've seen, he's a root admin.

I believe captain is now fixing the Immunity system so lower admins can no longer target root admins. Which is quite helpful. -tips hat-
Curses

Unread post by **broslaughter** » 18 Jul 2010, 09:35

Beetle wrote:No one mentioned how certain ppl like Hanzo or Giggles or Katie 2.0 will react to that?

LOL KATIE 2.0
I AM NO DRUNK:(

Unread post by **CaliforniaBear** » 18 Jul 2010, 09:48

broslaughter wrote:
Beetle wrote:No one mentioned how certain ppl like Hanzo or Giggles or Katie 2.0 will react to that?
LOL KATIE 2.0
I AM NO DRUNK:(

Indeed, She's sober.... All the time.

Unread post by **LaN** » 18 Jul 2010, 10:41

CaliforniaBear wrote:"Before" as in today? Or before as in before. With the recent major change with the admin concept, immunity was screwed up a little so lately root admins were being targeted by lower admins, being mass kicked, muted, etc. Such as.
LaN wrote:
CaliforniaBear wrote:From what I've seen, he's a root admin.

I believe captain is now fixing the Immunity system so lower admins can no longer target root admins. Which is quite helpful. -tips hat-
Curses

I'll find a away

Unread post by **Riftoff** » 18 Jul 2010, 10:50

broslaughter wrote:
Beetle wrote:No one mentioned how certain ppl like Hanzo or Giggles or Katie 2.0 will react to that?
LOL KATIE 2.0
I AM NO DRUNK:(

She was never drunk, just a little bit high.

calculatedChaos Gaming

Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'

Re: Removing 'high admin'